Make data-driven decisions to improve longevity

A startup focused on delivering a VOIP-based phone.

Categories

Communication, Technology, Startup,

Product Gallery

Reasons for Shutdown

Lack of Funds

Prototype was not impressive enough

In an interview with KICKCAP. Rajiv Poddar said they had failed to execute the plan due to both external and internal factors.
And he said that their prototype was not impressive enough and the team was not proven, and he continued on with, they needed a large sum of money to be able to deliver it to the market and with money it would have lasted them longer.

Direct Competitors and Similar Companies

Note: Direct competitors are defined by similarity score of more than 40%, while similar companies are defined by similarity score of less than 40%

No.	Name	Similarity score	Description	Industry	Categories	Location	Ownership status	Entity type	Stage of development	Transactional model type	Defensibility moats	Last financing round	Total raised	Post-money valuation	Last financing date	No. of funding round(s)	No. of investors	Investors	Total revenue	Market capitalization	No. of investments	No. of acquisitions	No. of board seats taken	Competition	Management	No. of employees	Company reputation	Contact info	Operational status	Operational duration	Shutdown date	Founded date	Legal name	Former legal name(s)	Ticker
1.	Tabula	33.8%	A semiconductor manufacturing company.	Information Technology & Services	Technology, Semiconductor, Manufacturing	United States	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	100-250	-	-	Inactive	-	-	2003	-	-	-
2.	ABBY	29.8%	A documentation service for A/B tests.	Information Technology & Services	Analytics, Developer Tools, Technology	Germany	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Inactive	-	-	2015	-	-	-
3.	Inovatis	18.4%	Provided small businesses with an IT and business environment worthy of larger structures.	Information Technology & Services	Web Development, Professional Services, Technology	France	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1-10	-	-	Inactive	-	-	2005	-	-	-
4.	inBloom	7.9%	Offered a data warehouse solution to help public schools.	Information Technology & Services	Non-Profit, Education, EdTech, Technology	United States	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Inactive	-	-	2011	-	-	-

Investors

No.	Image	Name	Investor type	Description	Location	Preferred investment stage(s)	Stages invested in	Assets under management (AUM)	Investment range	Investment sweet spot	Preferred investment focus	Preferred investment geography	No. of investments	No. of lead investments	No. of follow-on investments	No. of co-investments	Portfolio companies	No. of exits	Total exit value	No. of failed investments	Loss on investments	No. of acquisitions	No. of board seats taken	No. of funds	Limited partners	Co-investors	No. of partners	Partners	No. of employees	Management	Board members	Founders	Investor reputation	Contact info	Entity type	Legal name	Former legal name(s)	Founded date	Ticker
-		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Leadership

No.	Image	Name	Previous designation	Previous company	Previous biography	Previous profile type	Previous location	Experience	Education	Reputation	Current company	Current designation	Current biography	Current profile type	Current location	No. of investments	No. of exits	Total exit value	No. of board seats taken	Contact info
1.		Rajiv Poddar	Founder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Scribie	-	Rajiv is an Electronics and Telecommunications graduate from NIT Silchar. He joined Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Delhi as a IT Analyst in August 1999 and worked there till 2003. In March 2003, Rajiv moved to Bangalore, India and joined Lucent Technologies where he worked for another 3 years. In 2006 he left Lucent to start his own venture. Since then he has founded two companies and is involved full time in running Scribie.com. At Scribie.com, Rajiv oversees the R&D, Marketing and Business Development activities.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2.		Yatishyukti	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Funding

No.	Financing date	Financing round	Total amount raised	Post-money valuation	Financial viability	Fundraising target amount	Remaining target amount	Financing type	No. of investors	Board seats	Lead investors	Entity type	Financing status
-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-